Namyang Dairy takes issue with Kim & Chang advising both parties on deal Hong Won-sik’s lawyer argues dairy firm’s owner didn’t know that when signing deal
Translated by Ryu Ho-joung 공개 2022-01-12 08:14:14
이 기사는 2022년 01월 12일 08:06 thebell 에 표출된 기사입니다.
A LKB& Partners lawyer representing Hong Won-sik, owner and chairman of Namyang Dairy Products, has argued in a hearing on Friday that Hong was not aware that both his company and Hahn & Co were advised by the same law firm when he signed a deal to sell the controlling stake to the private equity firm last spring.The Seoul Central District Court held the hearing after Hahn & Co filed an injunction seeking to bar Hong and his family members from selling their stakes in the company to Dayou Winia, a deal signed last November in the midst of the ongoing legal dispute with Hahn & Co.
Hong’s lawyer said that, following advice from PH & Company’s CEO who brokered the deal between Hong and Hahn & Co, the chairman hired law firm Kim & Chang to act as legal counsel on the sale of the family-owned company. But Hong didn’t know that the law firm also advised Hahn & Co, the lawyer argued.
“Representing both parties in the same case is banned under the Civil Act unless the contracting parties agree,” Hong’s lawyer said. “Hahn & Co and Kim & Chang will need to show whether they gained consent from chairman Hong.”
Hong’s lawyer also accused Kim & Chang of committing a breach of trust, saying that requests from the chairman were not included in the share purchase agreement.
“Excluding the firm’s dessert brand from the sale and special treatment for existing executives, which were things that matter very much to chairman Hong, were not contained in the share purchase agreement,” Hong’s lawyer said, arguing that this could lead to suspicion of “deceitfulness”.
When a judge asked whether the contracting parties and their legal counsels had met together before signing the deal, Hong’s lawyer answered that didn’t happen. A lawyer representing Hahn & Co said while that might not happen, Hong must have recognized through PH & Company’s CEO that Kim & Chang was advising both parties.
Asked by the judge whether the chairman expressed his disagreement to Kim & Chang, Hong’s lawyer responded that he had conveyed disapproval. The judge asked again how’s that possible when the chairman recognized the law firm advised both parties only after the deal was signed, and then Hong’s lawyer corrected his answer by saying that Hong did that after the deal was struck.
The judge continued to ask whether the chairman took further action such as legal action against Kim & Chang, and Hong’s lawyer said “No such action has been taken yet”.
Answering the judge’s question about a service agreement between Hong and Kim & Chang, Hong’s lawyer said there was no written contract and that he would check further on the fee payment.
After hearing from both sides, the judge set the deadline to accept additional documents for January 14. (Reporting by Gyoung-tae Kim)
< 저작권자 ⓒ 자본시장 미디어 'thebell', 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지 >
관련기사
best clicks
최신뉴스 in 전체기사
-
- [Rating Watch]GS EPS, 8년만에 'AA0' 복귀…조달여건 '우호적'
- [IPO 모니터]퓨리오사AI, 상장 파트너 왜 바뀌었나
- [Market Watch]중소형 스팩 전성시대 '과열 주의보'
- [CFO 워치]'턴어라운드 성공' 김정기 하나증권 CFO, 그룹내 기여도 9% 육박
- NH증권, ROE 12% 회복세…'탄탄한 IB의 힘'
- [New Issuer]한화시스템, 공모채 시장 '데뷔전' 나선다
- [thebell desk]IPO 새내기주 오버행 '난맥상'
- 무림P&P, 1.5년물 CP 발행...외화 단기차입 줄인다
- 한국제약바이오협회, '국경 넘는 기술사업화' 교류회
- 나우어데이즈, 글로벌 음악 매거진 '롤링스톤' 코리아 디지털 커버 모델 발탁