NPS more selective about external managers The pension fund simplifies its investment program to give applying firms more autonomy
Translated by Ryu Ho-joung 공개 2020-04-03 08:00:28
이 기사는 2020년 04월 03일 08:00 thebell 에 표출된 기사입니다.
South Korea’s largest public pension fund has made changes in its alternative investment program, removing all sub-categories of fund strategies in a move that would allow external managers to have greater discretion on their proposals.The National Pension Service (NPS) announced last Friday that it would select external managers to allocate total 1.95 trillion won this year to alternative assets in the domestic market. It plans to commit a combined 950 billion won to private equity and venture capital funds which will be chosen through competition in a specified period, while allocating the remaining one trillion won to Corporate Partnership funds, for which applications will be evaluated whenever they are received.
The investment program has been greatly simplified compared to last year when there were four sub-categories – mid-cap PE funds, general VC funds, small to mid-sized VC funds and special situation and distressed funds – under PE and VC strategies.
This year, however, the pension fund has removed all sub-categories, allowing applying firms to decide strategies of funds as well as the size of them within a range of 80 billion to 200 billion won. The move is seen to give external managers greater autonomy in preparing their proposals.
But this will likely cause managers to come under more pressure to prove their worth. In the past years, some firms have applied for categories with lower competition at the last minute, hoping to improve their chance of winning the mandate. With changes made this year, such tricks are not possible anymore.
This means that managers now can depend on nothing but their own ability. That is, firms of a smaller size but with strong track records could have a greater chance of winning the mandate than bigger-sized rivals with relatively weak track records compared to their reputation.
The pension also said that it would not allow managers to form a consortium to serve co-general partners, which has been a common practice among firms that apply for alternative investment programs organized by domestic institutions.
But this practice has blurred accountability, often resulting in disputes surrounding the performance of funds managed by two general partners. The NPS seems to avoid problems associated with such occasions in the first place by evaluating individual firms.
“It has been more than 15 years since South Korean private equity markets began to grow, and institutions including the NPS have become more selective about external managers,” a private equity manager said. “The NPS has seemingly made it clear that it would evaluate firms solely based on their ability, which will likely put more pressure on them.”
(By reporter Han Hee-yeon)
< 저작권자 ⓒ 자본시장 미디어 'thebell', 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지 >
관련기사
best clicks
최신뉴스 in 전체기사
-
- '재무개선' AJ네트웍스, 조달비용 '확' 낮췄다
- '9년만에 엑시트' 한앤코, 한온시스템 거래구조 살펴보니
- 한국타이어앤테크놀로지, 한온시스템 인수한다
- [수술대 오른 커넥트웨이브]2대주주 지분매입 나선 MBK, 주식교환 카드 꺼냈다
- [이사회 모니터]이재용 에이비프로바이오 대표, 바이오·반도체 신사업 '드라이브'
- 와이투솔루션, 주인 바뀌어도 '신약' 중심엔 美 합작사 '룩사'
- 아이티센, 부산디지털자산거래소 본격 출범
- 아이에스시, AI·데이터센터 수주 증가에 '날개'
- [이사회 모니터]서정학 IBK증권 대표, ESG위원회도 참여 '영향력 확대'
- SW클라우드 '10주년' 폴라리스오피스, “초격차 밸류업”