Late intervention by financial authorities on Citibank Korea comes under fire FSC finds legal base to order US lender to take necessary measures to product retail clients
Translated by Kim So-in 공개 2021-11-01 07:48:41
이 기사는 2021년 11월 01일 07:42 thebell 에 표출된 기사입니다.
South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) held a meeting on Wednesday to approve an order forcing Citibank Korea to take necessary measures to protect its clients before closing down its retail banking operations in the country.Industry insiders pointed out that the authority's intervention was too late and it is repeating a similar mistake after it missed an opportunity to close loopholes of the banking law when HSBC closed its retail banking in South Korea a few years ago.
The FSC said on Wednesday that Citibank Korea‘s withdrawal of consumer banking in phases is not regarded as a "shutdown of banking business", which falls under the FSC‘s approval according to the current banking law.
The FSC and Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) have reviewed whether Citibank Korea’s decision is subject to the authorities’ approval according to the Article 55-1 of the country's banking act. The lender's consumer banking division accounts for 30.4% of its total assets.
Legal experts widely viewed that the lender will need the regulator’s authorization if it transfers part of its business, but closing part of its business will not require approval from the regulator. They used the HSBC’s withdrawal from Korea as a reference.
In 2013, HSBC’s Korean unit closed 10 out of 11 branches. At that time, HSBC received approval for closure of its branches, but did not receive approval for closure of its retail banking business.
This means that the FSC cannot apply the current banking act to put a brake on Citibank Korea's plan to shut down the consumer banking operations.
However, the authorities found a solution in the Financial Consumer Protection Act, which took effect on September 25. According to the law, the FSC can order financial product sellers to take necessary measures, such as correction or suspension, in order to protect the rights and interests of financial consumers and ensure a sound transaction order.
"Citibank Korea does not need regulatory approval to shut down its consumer banking operations under the banking act, so we searched for appropriate ordinance,” a financial watchdog official said. “We can protect consumers based on the Financial Consumer Protection Act, and actions can be taken if orders are violated.”
Criticism is arising over the financial authorities’ belated measures. Analysts said the financial authorities should have amended the banking act earlier after HSBC Korea’s retail banking shutdown.
As the domestic banking industry has become less attractive due to tighter regulations, there is a possibility that additional cases like HSBC and Citibank Korea may occur. Some market experts said that it is necessary to have a look at the entire banking act. (Reporting by Jang-jun Lee)
< 저작권자 ⓒ 자본시장 미디어 'thebell', 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지 >
관련기사
best clicks
최신뉴스 in 전체기사
-
- [한화생명 글로벌 은행업 도전기]김승연 회장의 못다 이룬 꿈…30년 만의 결실
- [보험사 IFRS17 조기도입 명암]KB손보, 취약했던 자본항목 개선 주도한 평가이익
- [캐피탈사 글로벌 모니터]롯데캐피탈, 인도네시아 현지 영업도 보수적으로
- [2금융권 연체 리스크]우리카드, 고위험 자산 관리 '양호'…대환대출 증가 부담
- [은행권 신경쟁 체제]시중은행 전환 대구은행, 판 뒤흔들 한방은
- DGB캐피탈, 대손비 증가에 순익 급감…연체율 3%대로
- [외국계 보험사는 지금]'흑자전환' ABL생명, 올해는 새 주인 찾을까
- 대구은행, '대기업·가계 대출' 시중은행 전환 기반 삼는다
- IBK캐피탈, 감리시스템 개선 부실화 모니터링 강화
- 우리금융, 증권 M&A 자본부담 최소화…'보험 인수전' 의식했나