NPS changes selection criteria for external managers The Korean public pension fund puts greater focus on quality of firms’ investment staff
Translated by Ryu Ho-joung 공개 2020-04-08 08:00:05
이 기사는 2020년 04월 08일 08시00분 thebell에 표출된 기사입니다
South Korea’s National Pension Service (NPS) has slightly changed the criteria used to select external managers for its alternative portfolio, with a greater emphasis on quality of investment staff.The NPS, the nation’s biggest public pension fund, recently revealed the criteria for the selection process of its external alternative managers, according to sources close to the matter on April 3. The criteria have been slightly changed compared to two years ago when the pension scheme last made public such information.
This came after the NPS announced late last month its plan to invest 1.95 trillion won in alternative assets in the domestic market this year. It plans to allocate 950 billion won to private equity and venture capital strategies, with the remaining one trillion won earmarked for Corporate Partnership funds.
Private equity and venture capital managers will be selected through competition. By fund strategy, there has been little change in the manager selection criteria for areas of infrastructure and real estate. But those for other alternative investment strategies have seen some notable changes.
The NPS evaluates firms based on their proposals and interview results, with each weighted at 50 percent. Changes have been made to its criteria for evaluating proposals.
The proposal evaluation consists of qualitative and quantitative components. Two years ago, each component had the maximum score of 30 and 70, respectively.
But now up to 40 points are allotted to qualitative part, as a new sub-component to evaluate firms’ investment staff and organizational stability in qualitative terms has been added with the maximum score of 10.
This change has consequently reduced the weight assigned to quantitative part, with the maximum score for each sub-component adjusted lower. At the same time, the NPS added another new sub-component to its quantitative scorecard to consider managers’ ability to provide opportunities for co-investments with the maximum score of 5.
Overall, these changes indicate the pension fund’s intention to put greater focus on quality of investment staff of applying firms and their ability to source investment opportunities.
The criteria for evaluation of interviews remained the same as those two years ago, with the maximum score of 100. They consist of seven sub-components with greater weight assigned to investment strategies and investment team among others.
The pension fund is slated to close applications for its external PE managers on April 29.
(By reporter Han Hee-yeon)
< 저작권자 ⓒ 자본시장 미디어 'thebell', 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지 >
관련기사
best clicks
최신뉴스 in 전체기사
-
- 키움증권 리테일 훼손 우려…이틀새 시총 2400억 증발
- 더본코리아, '노랑통닭' 인수 포기 배경은
- [i-point]탑런에이피솔루션, LG디스플레이 장비 공급 업체 등록
- [트럼프 제재 나비효과 '레드테크']한국 울리는 적색경보, 차이나리스크 확산
- [i-point]티사이언티픽, 파트너스 데이 성료…"사업 확장 속도"
- [i-point]빛과전자, 국제 전시회 참여 "미국 시장 확대"
- [탈한한령 훈풍 부는 콘텐츠기업들]잠잠한 듯했는데…JYP엔터의 중국 굴기 '반격 노린다'
- [LGU+를 움직이는 사람들]권준혁 NW부문장, 효율화 vs 통신품질 '균형' 숙제
- [저축은행경영분석]PF 늘린 한투저축, 순익 2위 등극…사후관리 '자신감'
- [저축은행경영분석]'PF 후폭풍' OK저축, 대손상각 규모만 3637억