Namyang chairman asked higher price after deal signed, Hahn & Co’s lawyer says Lawyer argues Hong Won-sik wanted to raise sale price two days after signing agreement
Translated by Ryu Ho-joung 공개 2022-01-17 07:43:25
이 기사는 2022년 01월 17일 07시41분 thebell에 표출된 기사입니다
Lawyers representing Namyang Dairy Products chairman Hong Won-sik and Seoul-based private equity firm Hahn & Co have continued to make their cases in a second hearing over the dispute about a share purchase agreement signed between the two parties last year.The hearing, held by the Seoul Central District Court on Thursday afternoon, attracted many spectators, with the seats in court packed and some people forced to stay outside.
Hong’s lawyer from LKB& Partners repeated his claim that a side agreement did exist between the two parties and sought to call six witnesses including three lawyers at law firm Kim & Chang, which advised both contracting parties on the deal, Hahn & Co CEO Scott Sang-Won Hahn, and PH & Company CEO Phillip Ham who brokered the deal between Hong and the private equity firm.
In response, a lawyer from Yoon & Yang representing Hahn & Co argued Hong asked a higher price after a share purchase agreement was inked between the two parties last spring, adding that such a request was rarely made and unacceptable in typical M&A deals.
“Two days after the deal was signed at a price of 820,000 won ($691.28) per share on May 27, 2021, Hong abruptly demanded an increase in the sale price to 900,000 won per share or advising fees equivalent to the price increase as the company’s stock price jumped on the news of the deal,” Hahn & Co’s lawyer said.
Hahn & Co later made a final offer of 850,000 won per share, according to text messages between Hong and PH & Company CEO Phillip Ham revealed during a separate hearing earlier this month. Hahn & Co’s lawyer stressed that this was to respond to Hong’s request and there was no other reason.
According to the Hahn & Co lawyer’s argument, Hong then met with the private equity firm and said it was “not a legal request but humane one,” asking the firm to “extend the winner’s generosity”.
Hong’s lawyer denied this and stressed again that there was a side agreement worth at least 3 billion won in cash a year, arguing the chairman tried several times to confirm with Hahn & Co whether the side agreement was included in the contract.
Lawyers representing the two parties were also at odds with each other on Dayou Winia, a company that struck a separate deal with Hong and his family members last November to buy their stakes in the dairy firm.
Hahn & Co’s lawyer pointed out that key positions at Namyang Dairy were taken by officials from Dayou Winia and the companies’ internal online malls were linked to each other, arguing that these were clearly beyond the scope of business consulting and could be seen as part of the business integration.
However, Hong’s lawyer claimed that Dayou Winia was acting as an adviser to Namyang Dairy which was in management crisis.
Hahn & Co’s lawyer also pointed out a delay in court proceedings because of the defendants’ slow response. Hong’s lawyer claimed there were some unavoidable reasons and that was not intentional.
After hearing both sides, the court set the next hearing date for February 24. (Reporting by Gyoung-tae Kim)
< 저작권자 ⓒ 자본시장 미디어 'thebell', 무단 전재, 재배포 및 AI학습 이용 금지 >
관련기사
best clicks
최신뉴스 in 전체기사
-
- [i-point]한컴라이프케어, 경북 산불 호흡보호장비 정비 지원
- [게임사 인건비 리포트]'효율 치중' 더블유게임즈, 미래 성장 '안갯속'
- [thebell interview]"젠시, AI가 상품 소개 작성…로봇 촬영까지"
- LG이노텍·LG디스플레이, 유리기판 사업화 시동
- [Company Watch]시노펙스, 반도체 필터 성장에 혈액투석 신사업까지 '본궤도'
- [i-point]제이엘케이, 'JLK-LVO' 혁신의료기기 통과
- [i-point]포커스에이아이, 차세대 나라장터 구축유공 표창장 수상
- [thebell interview]"매출 1000억 이어 신사업 두 마리 토끼 잡을 것"
- [Red & Blue]테마 바람 탄 아이스크림에듀, 사업 경쟁력 '재조명'
- 제노스코 '상장 불발' 이후, 오스코텍·메리츠 복잡한 셈법